Fitness Club

I'll begin with a caveat: I'm late to the "fat-loss code" game. My radar isn't fine-tuned to the next new thing in the diet world. I have read quite a few books on diet and nutrition over the years -- perhaps that's why I've become somewhat suspicious of them. Having never seen her first one, I decided to explore Wendy Chant's second diet book, Conquer the Fat-Loss Code, because I happened to stumble upon it, and it really did strike me as different from typical books in the category. When it comes to books on losing weight, that alone makes it stand out.

When I say it seemed different, I don't mean just at first glance. Every diet plan attempts to differentiate itself -- why else would anyone pick it up? However, most diet books follow a fairly straightforward formula: Promise an innovative new approach; persuade the reader that this time it's going work; present the plan.

What's Wrong With This Picture

The new approach section is usually the most interesting in any diet book. That's where you get the rational explanation for why everything before has failed, but this time, you're holding the key to success in your hands.

The persuasive section gives you an injection of emotional confidence to layer on top of all that good information. Depending on the skill of the author, you either become drawn in or feel the whiff of a used-car salesman. This is usually the make-it-or-break-it part of a diet book.

Then comes the actual plan. For chronic dieters, this section tends to be a big, fat disappointment. Most plans are the same. Boiled down to their essential elements, most are calorie-restriction diets accompanied by tired advice about exercise. Sometimes there are some diagrams of really fit cartoon people doing squats and such.

Duh.

These plans work, as any dieter will tell you -- up to a point. Typically, there's a lot of water loss in the initial days of the diet. Then there's some actual weight loss. Then the dieter hits a plateau, and the weight-loss grinds to a halt. The dieter becomes frustrated and gives up. The weight piles back on. It keeps piling on. The dieter's body has gone through a famine, and it's determined to protect itself for the next one that comes along. It layers on the fat, and the unhappy dieter ends up heavier than before.

Some Causes for Skepticism

I turned to Wendy Chant's diet plan before reading the book, because I didn't want to waste my time. What I saw there was something that really did seem different. Weird, but not in a goofy way. More like in a good weird-science way.

Since I'm not a nutritionist, I can't actually vouch for the science underlying Chant's plan, but what struck me was that it addresses the body's tendency to adapt, and it does so in several different ways. All of them have to do with tricking your metabolism so that it doesn't go into starvation mode/fat storage cycling.

Chant's plan seemed ridiculously complicated to me at first glance, and I've got to say, there are foods in it I normally would not consume or recommend (e.g., artificially flavored and sweetened products).

It can be very repetitive. I would never want to eat turkey three times in one day. I don't understand why Chant considers that a good idea, but whatever.

Some of the recipes strike me as gross: to wit, "egg poppers," which are basically cold, hard-boiled egg whites. Yuck. Way too many egg whites in this program, period, if you ask me. Double yuck.

Still, I thought there was something intriguing about the plan, and the book made sense to me in a way that didn't make me feel I was being verbally assaulted by a diet huckster -- so I decided to suggest it to my sister, who was in the market for something new and different in the way of a diet plan.

A New Hope

After years of yo-yo dieting, my sister had given up on dieting altogether -- but not on wanting to lose weight. Wendy Chant's program seemed less like a diet and more like a strategy to me, so I called my sister, and we brainstormed about it.

After reading the book herself, she was game to try it -- or at least, a version of it. Her version broke a lot of Chant's rules -- but considering that they're more or less offered as guidelines, not rules, we both thought that seemed OK.

Number one, she gave herself a real cheat day once a week, as opposed to what I would consider the program's weekly "indulgent" day. For my sister, Saturday wasn't about splurging on a dessert or a glass of wine -- she decided to eat whatever she pleased, all day long, and wash it down with an entire bottle of wine if the spirit moved her. She reported that her first cheat day was a gorge-fest, but after seeing what that did to her progress on the scales, she found she could self-regulate and be more or less measured on her subsequent cheat days. She says it's her own personal learning curve.

Number two, she quickly gave up on the exercise plan, and I fully supported that decision. Not that I'm opposed to exercise -- far from it. I just don't think anyone should have to follow a specific diet plan AND a specific exercise plan at the same time. I say, step up your activity with things you enjoy, or put off the exercise part until later -- after you've lost a few pounds and you understand how the diet works, and you're ready to crank things up to the next level.

Number three, she substituted like crazy. She made sure she was substituting a food of similar value -- e.g., chicken or fish for turkey, green beans for asparagus, etc. She just didn't want to go into obsession mode, thinking she had to run out to the supermarket if she didn't have exactly what the plan called for on hand.

Number four, she didn't eat everything. Said she just couldn't. I think eating more frequently is something worth shooting for, but five or six times a day is tough to fit into any schedule, so I sympathize. I don't think I would be in the mood for a Crystal Light protein powder "shake" or a handful of egg whites before bedtime either.

My sister says she stuck to the spirit of Chant's plan, if not the letter, and the reason I'm enthusiastic enough to highly recommend this book -- yes, indeed, I do HIGHLY RECOMMEND it -- is that her experience has so far borne out my expectations.

Qualified Success, Unqualified Optimism

You'll have to look at the plan yourself to really understand what I'm getting at -- I still think it's terrifically complicated, but I now believe it has to be. It seems that alternating the types of food you eat according to this program can trick your body into metabolizing food more efficiently. It's not just about calories in and calories burned, folks. It really isn't.

My sister's results? A steady loss of 2 1/2 lbs. per week for five weeks, which I consider a healthy and sustainable weight loss. She has three more weeks to go on her version of Wendy Chant's eight-week plan, and says if she drops another 7 1/2 lbs., she'll be delighted.

Then you can keep watching this space for updates to see if my sister succeeds at adapting the program further so that it can become a lifestyle that lets her keep the weight off. As everyone who's ever dieted before knows -- that's really the trick.

One more thing: Although I was unimpressed by many of the recipes in this book, I tried several, and some of them are quite good. You really should try the fake French toast. Strange, but tasty.

My sister and I are both hoping Wendy Chant really is marching to a different dietary drummer. Join the discussion! Send your comments to Daily News Central.

Please indicate whether your message is "public" or "private." Public messages may be posted on this site. Private messages will not be published.